GFC vs PRP: Which Gives More Hair Density?

Hair thinning and loss are common concerns that affects millions prompting a search for effective solutions . In the recent years there has been a rise in non-surgical regenerative treatments with GFC vs PRP at the top.

However. when it comes to great hair density, which one of the two is better? The following sections will answer this question and help you make an informed decision.

Understanding GFC vs PRP

Both GFC or Growth Factor Concentrate is a process derived from platelets using an advanced processing method. This method concentrates growth factors which will stimulate hair follicles and promote hair growth.

It is said to be more effective PRP as it is a more potent treatment, which leads to faster and noticeable results. But, it is more expensive than PRP.

Platelet-Rich Plasma, on the other hand, involves drawing blood from the patient for processing for concentrate platelets. It is then injected into the treatment area where the growth factors released from platelets promote healing and tissue regeneration.

PRP has been used for longer and is generally safe but requires more sessions and has a longer recovery time.

The Science Behind Growth Factors for Hair Regrowth

Both PRP and GFC have the power of growth factors backing them. Naturally occurring protein in the body, growth factors have an important role in the body - promoting cell proliferation, differentiation and tissue repair.

Understandably, the GFC method has a higher percentage of the growth factors than PRP. Despite the concentration, both methods promote hair regrowth and improvement in hair density - but the question stands which one of the two is better?

Also Read - Top Rated Clinics for Hair Transplant

Key Differences - Which Gives Better Results?

• GFC is a purer, more concentrated solution of growth factors that filters out any blood components that can trigger a reaction. A higher, cleaner concentration of specific growth factors can lead to better stimulation - better hair density.

• PRP requires activation by adding compounds such as calcium chloride or through tissue injury to release the growth factors. GFC already provides growth factors in a ready-to-use form.

• PRP may be longer used, GFC is gaining popularity for all the right reasons. Studies suggest GFC can be much more effective in providing better hair regrowth results.

• The results of PRP are seen after the third session and you may need maintenance sessions for long-lasting results. GFC provides quicker results and as per a study, has a 84% positive rate even in people with androgenetic alopecia.

Which one gives more density is something that depends on individual responses and the severity of hair loss. The protocol used by the clinic is another important factor that influences results.

Note: Both treatments are best suited for people with thinning or early-stage hair loss, as hair follicles are present but miniaturized/minimized.

Which Growth Factors Does GFC Use?

• Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) is necessary for growth and repair of hair cells.

• Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) boosts growth of new blood vessels.

• Platelet-derived Growth Factor (PDGF) promotes hair growth and enhances blood vessel formation.

• Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) Promotes the development of hair follicles and boosts hair growth.

GFC vs PRP vs Hair Transplant - When to Consider Surgery?

So far we have discussed the non-surgical approaches to hair regrowth, but what if a surgical option is also available for you. Which one should you opt for then?

• GFC and PRP are regenerative therapies that aim at strengthening the existing hair fall. Which improves the thickness and density of the hair in areas with follicles that can stimulate existing hair.

• Hair transplants on the other hand relocates hair follicles from a donor area to bald or thinning areas. It is only effective when there is complete baldness and there is no viable follicles left.

There are also cases when people opt for PRP or GFC after hair transplant to improve the recipient area’s health. This promotes the survival of the transplanted grafts, thus improving the density of existing hair as well.

These are not direct alternatives of each other but cam be useful together. PRP or GFC cannot cover bald spots.

Also Read - Dr Serkan Aygin Clinic Reviews

Which one is right for you?

Choose GFC if:

• You want faster results, less discomfort and do not mind a big price tag.

Choose PRP if:

• You are on a budget or prefer more established treatment

Choose hair transplant if :

• You have bald spots or severe balding and want a natural-looking result.

It is important that you consult an expert for the best treatment that suits your needs and gives the best result.

Making an informed choice requires thorough consultation with an expert for understanding the processes. They can also guide you to choose the best option as per your individual condition.

Get in touch now to consult the best hair transformation experts from across the world!